NewTimeSpace Publishing Principles
These principles outline the standards and practices that govern NewTimeSpace as an AI-powered international financial news media platform. We are committed to delivering accurate, insightful and innovative coverage of financial markets, industry trends and technological advancements, with a focus on AI and innovation as the core drivers of growth. Built on our fact-based reporting of market dynamics, ETF flows, IPOs and corporate developments, these principles ensure that our journalistic work serves investors, professionals and global audiences with integrity and transparency. We believe that high-quality financial news coverage not only uncovers the truth, but also drives industry innovation and sustainable growth.
Introduction
In the rapidly evolving financial world, NewTimeSpace adheres to the highest professional and ethical standards in financial journalism. We recognize our responsibility to provide authoritative, independent and truthful information across all content formats—including online articles, social media, videos and data-driven insights. Our editorial team, research institute members and contributors must always prioritize accuracy, integrity and authority, ensuring that content is free from external interference. These principles are not merely rules, but our core values that must be upheld in both spirit and letter. Violations may result in disciplinary action. When faced with uncertainty, members of the editorial team should proactively seek guidance from senior editors. We are committed to striking a balance between the public's right to know and respect for the rights of individuals and organizations, thereby promoting transparency, fairness and innovative development in financial markets.
Summary of Editorial Standards
- Accuracy is the top priority.
- Correct errors promptly, clearly and publicly.
- Ensure balance and freedom from bias.
- Respect confidential or embargoed information.
- Protect sources from interference or danger.
- Never include personal opinions in news coverage.
- Never fabricate or plagiarize content.
- Never alter still or moving images except for cropping, resizing, tone and color adjustments.
- Never pay for or accept bribes.
- Disclose conflicts of interest to management.
These standards safeguard the trust between NewTimeSpace's journalism and its readers, as well as the integrity of the publication. They form part of the editorial team's contracts, guiding editorial management, writing, disciplinary, promotion and recruitment procedures, and protecting independence, standing and reputation.
Our Mission
- Discover corporate value and enable growth
- Connect global investors with timely intelligence
- Advance finance through AI-driven news, reshaping global narratives
Our Vision
To be a world-leading AI-enabled financial media platform, empowering users and entrepreneurs with intelligent insights while promoting financial inclusion and sustainable development.
Our Strengths
- Expert Team: Seasoned financial writers, analysts, and technologists
- Smart Technology: AI-powered real-time analytics and content recommendations
- Global Reach: Coverage across Hong Kong, Mainland China, APAC, and North America
Our Values
- Truth and Objectivity: Independent, objective, transparent, and accurate reporting
- Innovation and Foresight: Pioneering new models for AI in financial media
- Responsibility and Trust: Creating lasting value for users, partners, and society
Our Featured Content
- IPO Daily: Focuses on the full lifecycle of Chinese-concept stocks IPOs — from application, filing, feedback, hearing, registration, approval, gray market trading, subscription, listing, to lock-up expiration — Providing comprehensive news and updates on new and recent listings. We also track IPO star rankings, sponsor league tables, underwriter rankings, auditor rankings, IPO law firm rankings, bookrunner rankings, public subscription multiple rankings, cornerstone investor rankings, subscription amount rankings, fundraising amount rankings, first-day turnover rankings, first-day performance rankings, subscription insights, and NTS insights
- ETF Daily: Centers on Chinese concept indices and ETF intelligence, delivering professional news and data analysis across equity ETFs, commodity ETFs, bond ETFs, cross-border ETFs, digital asset ETFs, connect ETFs, Hong Kong local ETFs. Coverage includes intraday ETF intelligence, ETF funding leaderboards, ETF financing rankings, daily /weekly/monthly ETF reports, size change rankings, yield rankings, and fund flow rankings
- NewTimeSpace Research: Dedicated to China’s core capital markets and forward-looking industries, offering systematic and original insights through data reviews, ranking lists, in-depth research, and overseas expansion studies
NewTimeSpace is not only a news outlet — it is your AI-powered financial platform and partner. Whether you are an investor, corporate executive, or policymaker, we are committed to building a more transparent and intelligent financial future. From "telling the stories of Chinese enterprises well" to "building a global value network, NewTimeSpace strives to help every user and partner transcend the boundaries of time and space, achieving the creation, inheritance, and growth of wealth.
Ethics Policy
Ethics is the cornerstone of our work. All employees, editorial team members, research institute fellows and contributors of NewTimeSpace must abide by strict ethical guidelines to uphold public trust. These guidelines include maintaining independence and avoiding any external influences that may compromise the objectivity of coverage, such as pressure from advertisers, investors or political entities; ensuring transparency by disclosing any potential conflicts of interest, including personal shareholdings or relationships relevant to the subject matter of coverage; adhering to impartiality by presenting all relevant perspectives in reporting, avoiding bias, and ensuring that financial analysis is based on reliable data rather than personal opinions. We are also committed to respecting privacy and protecting the privacy of individuals and organizations in our coverage, unless disclosure is clearly required in the public interest. In addition, we actively promote diversity and inclusiveness, ensuring that our coverage reflects the diverse voices of the global financial ecosystem, including perspectives from different regions, genders and backgrounds. Through these practices, we not only comply with standards, but also strive to exceed them to set a benchmark for financial media.
General Guidelines
- Pursue truth, fairness, objectivity, impartiality and comprehensiveness.
- Ensure accuracy, fairness and balance.
- Do not take statements out of context or distort facts.
- Ensure balance by granting individuals, groups or organizations the right to respond.
- Refrain from self-censorship or being influenced by personal political beliefs or external pressure.
- Correct inaccuracies, misleading facts, incorrect figures or distortions promptly, clearly and publicly.
- Avoid pandering to sensationalism, indecency or tabloid-style content; exercise caution when covering violence, crime, suicide or minors.
- Respect reputation and privacy; exercise prudence when featuring non-voluntary subjects, especially children.
- Publish the conduct/data of public officials only when it is relevant to their official duties or in the public interest.
- Avoid conflicts of interest; declare them to direct supervisors; assign other personnel to handle the matter if a conflict arises.
- Resist the influence of political or economic interests related to oneself, family members or employers; maintain political neutrality.
- Do not seek monetary advantages from obtained information; do not pass on information to gain indirect benefits.
- Notify supervisors if coverage involves companies/financial instruments in which one has personal/familial interests; refrain from trading securities within the past month; avoid short-term transactions (less than one month); disclose conflicts to supervisors.
- Do not distort facts for advertisers or other considerations; resist external pressure or economic inducements.
- Do not discriminate on the basis of age, race, color, belief, religion, place/circumstances of birth, disability, marital status, gender or sexual orientation.
- Include diverse voices to achieve balanced journalism and an inclusive culture.
Social Media
- Clarify that opinions expressed on social media are personal views and do not represent NewTimeSpace.
- Keep newsroom discussions confidential; never share them on social media, blogs or Twitter.
- Publish news on NewTimeSpace platforms first; post teasers of no more than 30 words with a link back to the NewTimeSpace website.
- Apply sound judgment, rely on credible sources, and uphold fairness, balance and accuracy in all social media activities.
- Identify oneself as a NewTimeSpace editor in professional profiles; personal accounts should reflect this affiliation in posts.
- Never engage in misrepresentation in chat rooms/online forums.
- Do not associate personal beliefs (political, religious) with NewTimeSpace.
- Do not obtain information through illegal means (e.g., hacking); information from public networks is acceptable if sources are reliable.
- Be mindful that social media presence reflects professionalism and the reputation of the publication.
- Treat information from non-official websites as unconfirmed; verify it with relevant organizations.
- Cite internet sources; comply with copyright and defamation laws.
Correction and Complaint Policy
Accuracy is our commitment to readers. If errors occur in content, we will make corrections in a prompt and transparent manner. The correction process requires clearly indicating the erroneous facts, corrected content and date in the original article, while issuing notifications via the website and social media to ensure readers are informed in a timely manner. Readers may submit complaints or contributions via email (contact@newtimespace.com) or the website form. We commit to initiating an investigation within 7 days and providing a response within 14 days. For serious complaints, an independent editorial committee will conduct a review to ensure fair handling. We regard errors as learning opportunities, and the editorial team is responsible for drawing lessons from each correction, improving our processes and standards, and thus continuously enhancing the reliability of content.
Digital Corrections
- Make corrections within the story; mark "Corrected" at the top/bottom.
- Handled by senior production editors and desk editors.
- Add a "Corrected" field below "Published"/"Updated"; use highlighted color and timestamp; include a hover box with details.
Retractions
- Retract content if facts are incorrect or contain excessive errors; preliminary decision by desk heads/senior editors; final decision in consultation with the editor-in-chief.
- Digital retractions: mark clearly and remove from public view; replace with a template notice.
- Retain the headline with the prefix "Retracted" added by editors; edit if there are safety/legal concerns.
- Add a "Retracted" image; remove other related assets.
- If republishing, use an editorial headline and notice that transparently explains the reason for retraction.
Verification/Fact-Checking Standards
Fact-checking is an indispensable part of financial reporting. All content must undergo a rigorous verification process to ensure accuracy and credibility. We require that facts be confirmed by at least two independent sources, especially when involving financial data, market forecasts or corporate statements. Data accuracy relies on reliable sources such as official financial reports, regulatory documents and AI analysis tools. We emphasize transparent verification by citing sources in reports and providing links or references when necessary, allowing readers to verify information independently. In addition, we use AI tools for preliminary fact-checking, but final confirmation must be completed by experienced editors. This multi-layered verification approach not only reduces errors, but also enhances the depth and authority of our coverage.
Verification Process
- Treat accuracy as sacrosanct; authenticate data/materials from reputable publications/organizations; double-check all key information.
- Gather information from ethical companies and official institutions; verify with experts/official data.
- Clearly explain technical terms/statistics; provide source-specific evidence when required.
- Adhere to verified information; correct errors promptly and transparently if identified; conduct thorough investigations into reader inquiries.
- Clearly identify sources, including the titles of experts.
- Single-source stories are subject to strict scrutiny; require approval from senior managers.
Anonymous Source Policy
The use of anonymous sources should be exercised cautiously and limited to necessary circumstances to protect sources and maintain the integrity of coverage. For example, we may consider anonymity when a source faces the risk of retaliation for disclosing sensitive financial information. Editors must personally know the identity of the source and verify the information through independent channels. In reporting, we will explain the reason for using an anonymous source and provide as much context as possible to enhance credibility. We avoid over-reliance on anonymous sources, especially in key financial reports, to ensure the transparency and accountability of content. This policy balances the need to obtain information with the maintenance of public trust.
Conditions for Use
- Use anonymity only when disclosing the source’s identity would pose a serious risk.
- The editorial team must assess the reliability and motives of anonymous sources.
- Prioritize named sources whenever possible to enhance credibility.
Reader Engagement and Feedback
We regard readers as partners and encourage active interaction to improve content quality. Through comment sections, email (contact@newtimespace.com) and social media, we collect valuable opinions, and regularly host online discussions and Q&A sessions focusing on financial trends and AI innovation. We commit to responding promptly to constructive feedback and incorporating it into considerations for improving our coverage. At the same time, we strictly protect reader data, comply with relevant privacy regulations, and ensure a safe and inclusive interactive environment. This reader-centric approach not only enriches our content, but also strengthens our connection with global audiences.
Engagement Mechanisms
- Encourage readers to submit feedback, suggestions or contributions to contact@newtimespace.com.
- Regularly analyze reader engagement data to optimize content strategies.
- Host virtual seminars and invite readers to participate in discussions on financial topics.
Editorial Best Practices
Our editorial process is designed to produce high-quality, readable content. Articles should have a clear structure and use plain language to explain complex financial concepts for the benefit of a broad readership. We emphasize balanced reporting by presenting multiple perspectives on controversial topics such as market volatility or regulatory changes. AI is innovatively used for data analysis and trend forecasting, but all content must be reviewed and polished by human editors. The editorial team and research institute fellows receive regular training in financial journalism and ethics to maintain professional standards. These practices ensure that our output is not only accurate, but also insightful and engaging.
Content Creation Guidelines
- Ensure all analysis is based on in-depth research and data verification by the research institute.
- Prioritize the use of AI tools as aids, with final decisions made by the editorial team.
- Encourage cross-departmental collaboration to enhance the comprehensiveness and innovation of content.
Unsigned Article Policy Explanation
Bylines are a reflection of accountability. Articles published by NewTimeSpace typically bear the author’s name to highlight individual responsibility. The byline "NewTimeSpace Research Institute" may be used only for security considerations or collectively edited content, subject to approval by senior editors. External contributors must disclose any relevant conflicts of interest. This policy enhances transparency and encourages high-quality contributions.
Byline Exceptions
- Collective research reports produced by the research institute may use the byline "NewTimeSpace Research Institute".
- All changes to bylines must be documented and filed.
Misinformation Response Guidelines
In the financial sector, misinformation can cause severe economic losses, so we are committed to proactively combating it. When reporting on misinformation, we clearly label it as "Unverified" or "Rumor" and provide fact-based rebuttals. On social media, we monitor and correct misinformation, using hashtags such as #FactCheck to increase visibility. For videos and photos, we verify media sources, avoid using unauthenticated visual content, and utilize AI tools to detect tampering. We also collaborate with fact-checking organizations and share resources to improve overall accuracy. This comprehensive approach applies to all platforms, ensuring that our content serves as a bulwark against misinformation.
Reporting on Misinformation
- Clearly distinguish facts from rumors and avoid amplifying misleading content.
- Use AI tools to quickly identify potential misinformation.
Social Media and Visual Content
- Promptly label and correct false posts on platforms.
- For videos/photos, ensure sources are traceable and free from tampering.
Sourcing and Attribution
Proper attribution is a hallmark of integrity. All information must clearly cite sources; direct quotes must be accurately identified, and indirect references must indicate the origin. We encourage original reporting and avoid over-reliance on a single source. When using third-party content, ensure that permission is obtained or that use complies with fair use principles. This practice not only respects intellectual property rights, but also enhances the reliability of our coverage.
Attribution Standards
- Prioritize official and authoritative sources.
- For research institute data, specify internal research methodologies.
Generative Artificial Intelligence
AI is a core competitive advantage of NewTimeSpace, but its use must be transparent. If content is AI-assisted, we will label it as "AI-Assisted". All AI outputs must be reviewed and revised by editors to ensure accuracy and impartiality. We are committed to the ethical use of AI, avoiding the generation of misinformation and ensuring compliance with our fact-checking standards. This approach combines technological innovation with human judgment to enhance content quality.
AI Usage Guidelines
- AI is primarily used for data analysis and preliminary draft generation.
- The NewTimeSpace Research Institute is responsible for overseeing the training and application of AI models.
Plagiarism
We have a zero-tolerance policy for plagiarism, including the unauthorized copying, paraphrasing or adoption of others’ ideas without attribution. We use detection tools to screen all submitted content. Plagiarism will result in immediate termination of cooperation and public correction. This strict policy upholds originality and professionalism.
Detection and Consequences
- All submissions must be screened using anti-plagiarism software.
- Violators will be permanently excluded from future cooperation.
Social Media
Social media is an important channel for extending our coverage, and content on all platforms must adhere to the same editorial standards. We encourage the sharing of accurate information, discourage the spread of rumors, and regularly review posts to respond to feedback and correct errors.
Platform Guidelines
- Ensure all posts are reviewed by the editorial team.
- Encourage members of the NewTimeSpace Research Institute to share professional insights, with clear indication that these are personal views.