NewTimeSpace News:As of 13:28 on March 17, 2026, the SSE 180 Financial Index (000018) surged 1.48%. Its constituent stocks saw widespread gains, with New China Life Insurance up 3.71%, China CITIC Bank up 3.04%, China Pacific Insurance up 2.83%, and Ping An Insurance (Group) of China, CITIC Securities and other stocks following the upward trend. TheGuotai SSE 180 Finance ETF(510230) rose 1.28% to RMB 1.34 per share. In the long run, as of March 16, 2026, theGuotai SSE 180 Finance ETFhad a cumulative increase of 1.22% in the past week. (The stocks listed above are only constituent stocks of the index and do not constitute any specific investment recommendation.)

In terms of liquidity, theGuotai SSE 180 Finance ETFrecorded an intraday turnover rate of 1.07% and a trading volume of RMB 46.8932 million. In the long run, as of March 16, the ETF had an average daily trading volume of RMB 54.2182 million in the past year.

In terms of scale, the latest scale of theGuotai SSE 180 Finance ETFreached RMB 4.337 billion. (Data source: Wind)

Data showed that leveraged funds have continued to build positions in the ETF. The latest margin purchase volume of theGuotai SSE 180 Finance ETFstood at RMB 1.0027 million, with the latest margin balance reaching RMB 11.0384 million. (Data source: Wind)

As of March 16, the net asset value (NAV) of theGuotai SSE 180 Finance ETFhas risen 46.90% in the past three years. In terms of profitability, as of March 16, 2026, since its establishment, the ETF has achieved a maximum monthly return of 42.33%, a longest consecutive monthly gain of 4 months with a cumulative increase of 83.31%, and an average monthly return of 5.72% in rising months. The historical probability of making a profit with a 3-year holding period is 74.19%. As of March 16, 2026, the ETF has delivered an annualized excess return of 4.76% over the benchmark in the past two years.

As of March 13, 2026, the Sharpe ratio of theGuotai SSE 180 Finance ETFwas 1.06 in the past two years.

In terms of drawdown, as of March 16, 2026, the ETF has a relative drawdown of 0.05% against the benchmark since the start of the year.

In terms of fees, the management fee rate of theGuotai SSE 180 Finance ETFis 0.50% and the custodian fee rate is 0.10%.

In terms of tracking accuracy, as of March 16, 2026, the ETF had a tracking error of 0.006% in the past month.

In terms of valuation, the latest price-to-earnings ratio (PE-TTM) of the SSE 180 Financial Index tracked by theGuotai SSE 180 Finance ETFis only 7.32 times, at the 15.94% quantile of the past year. This means the valuation is lower than that in more than 84.06% of the time in the past year, standing at a historically low level.

TheGuotai SSE 180 Finance ETFclosely tracks the SSE 180 Financial Index, which selects listed securities from the banking, insurance, securities, trust and other industries in the SSE 180 Index as its constituent samples, reflecting the overall performance of listed securities in the financial industry on the Shanghai Stock Exchange.

Data showed that as of February 27, 2026, the top 10 weight stocks of the SSE 180 Financial Index (000018) are Ping An Insurance (Group) of China, China Merchants Bank, Industrial Bank, CITIC Securities, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Guotai Junan & Haitong Securities, Agricultural Bank of China, Bank of Communications, Bank of Jiangsu and China Pacific Insurance, with the total weight of the top 10 stocks accounting for 61.33%. (The stocks listed above are only constituent stocks of the index and do not constitute any specific investment recommendation.)

BOCOM International stated that despite a year-on-year decrease of 3 working days in the month, corporate loans have shown a recovery trend. In particular, medium and long-term loans increased by a substantial RMB 350 billion year-on-year, indicating that with the concentrated start of infrastructure projects and the effective implementation of supporting financing, bank credit extension and revenue growth are expected to receive further support. The continuous narrowing of the scissors gap between M2 and M1 is also conducive to banks improving their deposit structure and alleviating net interest margin pressure.

NewTimeSpace Disclaimer: All content herein is the original work of NewTimeSpace. Any reproduction, reprinting, or use of this content in any other manner must clearly indicate the source as "NewTimeSpace". NewTimeSpace and its authorized third-party information providers strive to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data, but do not guarantee the absolute correctness thereof. This content is for reference only and does not constitute any investment advice. All transaction risks shall be borne by the user.